GLENN BECK “PROVES” HOW THE BEATLES SONG REVOLUTION WAS PART OF A SECRET PLOT TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD
Why is it that the crazier Fox News Channel host Glenn Beck gets the higher his ratings rise and the more popular he becomes?
Just this week, Beck was found to be the second most popular television personality in America (behind only Oprah) in a recent Harris Poll. His Fox News “documentary” on Communism Friday drew 1,127,000 viewers. According to Mediaite.com, that’s “a huge number.”
Beck took to his chalkboard yesterday to explain how The Beatles, the world’s all-time most popular rock band, were secretly Maoists. He even detailed how The Beatles were part of a progressive plot to take over the world.
This is insane.
Paul McCartney was such an avowed anti-Capitalist that he’s only worth $6 billion. But wait! The Beatles DO mention Chinese Communist Chairman Mao Tse-tung in their song Revolution:
But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow
Of course, it’s only to MOCK on him, a fact Beck conveniently leaves out. In fact, Beck is either completely and totally insane or a liar. John Lennon was one of the most virulent critics of Mao of his era. Don’t believe me? Check out the album cover for his 1972 release of “Some Time in New York City.” Lennon has a song on the album entitled “We Are All Water.” He sings:
There may be not much difference between Chairman Mao and Richard Nixon if we strip them naked.
Since Lennon was on Nixon’s “Enemies List,” it’s pretty safe to assume that’s NOT a compliment he was directing at Mao. Lennon then puts a doctored photo of Nixon and Mao wrestling naked on the cover of the album:
Glenn Beck knows all of this. He was a disc jockey in the ’70s. So, to quote Nixon himself, let me make this perfectly clear-The Beatles WERE NOT Maoists. Glenn Beck is a crazy, goddamn liar.
&fmt=18
Tags: Glenn Beck, The Beatles
January 26, 2010 at 2:56 pm |
Next week Beck will reveal the true meaning behind the Strawberry Fields lyrics.
January 26, 2010 at 3:37 pm |
[...] The future is not “the same as the past only more intense”. As Lennon says in the song Glenn Beck has just attacked in 2010; “You say you want a Revolution well; YOU [...]
January 26, 2010 at 10:54 pm |
You’ve got to love the quote from Andy Stern. It’s taken COMPLETELY out of context. He could be talking about prisons, his children, or dealing with Al-Qaeda for all we know. Amazing.
January 27, 2010 at 11:22 am |
There may not be much difference
between Marilyn Monroe and Lenny Bruce
If you check their coffins
There may mot be much difference
Between Chairman Mao and Richard Nixon
If you strip them naked
It amazes one to realize the extent to which this silly country is susceptible to such blatant propaganda as spewed forth on a Daily basis by FOX Noise.
These are the days of America’s ultimate doom. When a clueless thought Nazi like Glenn Beck is able to hijack America political conversation, it only proves beyond a wisp of a doubt that America has swallowed the fatal capsule of its own demise.
Seriously, did you ever, in your weirdest, stupidest fantasies think your country would fall as low as it has? It kinda makes you wonder.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
June 3, 2010 at 3:14 pm |
Get the facts about Beck at The Glenn Beck Review, sharethisurlaboutglenbek.wordpress.com It covers his deceit and his hypocrisy and shows how unqualified he is to address any complicated issue.
April 21, 2011 at 9:29 am |
I wouldn’t say that John Lennon was a virulent critic of Mao.
In Woman, John says, in the background, “You hold half of the sky.” A direct quotation from Chairman Mao.
All I can say is that John, if anything, wasn’t dogmatic. He agrees or disagrees based on what he believes regardless whether he be red (mao), blue(nixon) or whatever hue he may be.
May 27, 2011 at 3:09 am |
I find myself at this website, not because I hold any other person’s views above my own (not that my views are anything to shout about, but they are mine and mine alone…if someone wants to challenge them, bring convincing arguments and not the routine parroted MSM views).
I found myself humming Revolution (sung by the Beatles; written by John Lennon). After awhile, the words came back to me…what struck me were these lines:
“You say you want a revolution…
…You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We’re doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait”
Which makes me think of a man who had and could have had a great influence on many people. A man who wanted people to live in harmony with other men (and, lest I be labeled something I am not…live in harmony with other women….harmony with humankind) and nature. Something I think transcends race, religion, political affiliation, etc would want.
Then the words struck me…John Lennon was writing about people that were conspiring to start a revolution to change the world into something they envisioned as better (the end justifies the means).
Then I thought, maybe John Lennon, who had such an influence on his generation, was approached by people that wanted him to help make a perfect world by means that John Lennon couldn’t justify to himself morally.
How many celebrities have been shot by adoring fans? Just curious.
Does the end justify the means?
What and who will REALLY benefit at the end?
RIP John.